Media

Corporate Identities Grapple With Disclosing Financial Information

Talk Money…Don’t

One of the things that our parents taught us when we were young was to never discuss the family’s business with anybody. Especially the family’s finances. No one needed to know how much money Dad made a year or how much Mom’s bonus check was from her employer. It just wasn’t anybody’s business.

Corporate living taught us that it was taboo to discuss pay, raises, bonuses and anything financially related to our jobs. It was just something that you did not do. And, in certain corporate clients, discussing financial matters could get you severely reprimanded, or worse, terminated – – and rightfully so. Considering that if employees #A and #B were hired at both the same time, for the same job and had the same skill set, but employee #A made $15,000 more than employee #B, it would stand to figure that one of these employees may be highly disgruntled and make his employer’s life miserable. Which is why you just do not discuss money.

Given the current economic state of parts of the country and of corporate entities, companies are starting to rethink the posture of not talking about their financial picture. Layoffs are in abundance, companies are shutting down, filing bankrupt and losing revenue at rapid paces. All of these activities greatly upset consumer confidence and is a big contributing factor when they are deciding to spend or not to spend.

Companies ideally want consumers to have a healthy, robust image of their company or product and want them to feel good when they consider spending their money with them. The bottom line is that businesses and consumers are hesitant about spending money if they don’t think the company is secure or stable. With issues like the Enron situation and the plight of the auto manufacturer’s, people think twice before writing out their checks…or even trusting someone else.

Your Company’s Disclosure

Sharing your corporate’s financial picture may be something you want to consider in an effort to appeal to your customer base. A good idea? Sure it is given that it could quite possibly work in your favor rather than against. In a news article, Fidelity decided to disclose their financial information to their readers and consumer’s, hoping to dissuade any negative feelings or misinformation about the company’s financial health. A bold move on their part, Fidelity hopes to alleviate some of the angst that consumers may be feeling and try to instil in them a sense of calm and assurance in Fidelity’s financial matters. Here is a blurb taken from their mission statement that pointedly outlines what they do:

Fidelity Investments is an international provider of financial services and investment resources. In addition to more than 300 Fidelity mutual funds, the Company also offers discount brokerage services, retirement services, estate planning, wealth management, securities execution and clearance and life insurance, among others. Fidelity Management & Research Company (FMR Co.) is the investment advisor to Fidelity’s family of mutual funds. In May 2007, the Company sold 91% of its American Depositary Receipts (ADR) in PetroChina.

With a company like Fidelity with many diversified interests and investment areas, they are aware as any other corporate entity that any of their areas of interest can take a turn quickly and cause consumer concern. What Fidelity has done to assuage this is to be proactive in assuring their customers that they are fiscally sound and operating efficiently. A plus for Fidelity Investments and a plus for corporate entities who follow the same path. Fidelity has stated that they will post publicly the company’s financial state and offer links and information on their actual company’s figures.

Can you do what Fidelity has done with your corporate site? Should you do that with your corporate site? How would you handle tough financial questions about your company’s financial health, especially those that prod and insinuate?

The Secret to Success for Social Media Sites

What is it that can make a social site like FaceBook or MySpace unquenchable to other heavy Internet competitors? What keeps these sites from going under when a new, more fun and exciting site is launched and (seemingly) everyone goes over to the new kid’s playground to play? How can social media sites make themselves unstoppable? What is the key?

Digg, Stumble and Twitter, Oh My!
There are only a handful of social media sites that are so common, you don’t even have to offer an explanation of who or what they are when used in a sentence. Sites like Digg, StumbleUpon and Twitter have become so entrenched in the mental landscape of Internet users, that to even think of using a different site can be almost offensive to people. Users find what works best for them, use it to its maximum and passes the word along to others. There are very, very few sites that can tout this user-loyalty, and, never will they say that it was an easy task to win the hearts and admiration of their readers.

The one notable factor that these social media sites can say resonates, among other factors, is their dedication to consistency. Users can be very serious, and rightly so, about their technology and their expectations of it. In other words, they want it to work when they need it and want it to work. Outages are understandable, periods of down time are also understandable, but users can be unforgiving when a site promises one thing and fails to deliver. Or worse, they deliver something altogether different.

Gauging Consistency

The secret to success for social media sites is not a mystery. Consistency is key and the ability to fully deliver the product is desirable and demanded. Sites like Twitter have enjoyed immeasureable success because they have harnessed the ability to remain consistent yet flexible in a fast changing social media world. How can that be? Twitter boasts the 140-character micro-blogging interface where users can make snappy, quick posts multiple times in a day or at one sitting. They have never veered from that platform. They have not implemented any other tool that would take them from the premise that they are “quick and easy.” They have not included the ability to upload videos, display photos or images or even the option to upload a podcast. They have not tried to market themselves as a full-service blog, and therein lies the beauty of their micro-blogging platform. They keep it simple. Of course, if users desire more, they are welcome to find other programs and platforms that fit their needs. However, part of the success that I’m speaking of is utilizing a particular platform for what it is specifically intended for to its maximum use.

How can your social media presence be successful? Deliver your goods promptly and as accurately as possible without veering away from your purpose. Simple as that. Users want what they want and expect you to deliver just what you say you will. Give them anything different, and they will seek consistency in other areas.

Slow Blogging: How the Concept Affects Good News

Recently, the New York Times profiled a story about bloggers who embrace the idea of slow blogging. In this type of blogging or information delivery, concepts and ideas are delivered at a more slower, deliberate pace that allow both the blogger and the blogger’s audience to completely absorb the elements of a story and be able to remember what the story is really about. Slow blogging can be likened to the idea of reading a long book, watching the story unfold and develop, anticipating the end while taking your time to let it all happen…slowly.

A Slow Blog Manifesto, written in 2006 by Todd Sieling, a technology consultant from Vancouver, British Columbia, laid out the movement’s tenets. “Slow Blogging is a rejection of immediacy,” he wrote. “It is an affirmation that not all things worth reading are written quickly.”

The concept of slow blogging is spawned by the idea that good, solid blog stories are those that are well-thought, well-formed and that take a little extra time to publish just in case elements of the story changes. The idea is not so vastly different from that of well thought journalism stories. Good, solid stories that appear in reputable outlets also require that they are well-thought out and well-formed as well. And, just like in the case of journalism stories, elements of the blog story can change too, which is why slow blogging is a conducive form of news delivery in some cases. But the process of slow blogging allows the blogger to formulate a story and deliver when it is completely ready for publishing. Or, as in the case with the New York Times featured blogger Barbara Ganley, allows the reader to go on the journey with the blogger step by step, and participate through their entries as if they were there with her. 

In corporate environments, slow blogging may actually add value to a concept that is relatively new. The idea has been around since 2006, but companies and bloggers alike are starting to analyze the process of slow blogging to see if there are any benefits that companies can gain from the idea. Most media outlets and media relations departments of large corporations act on a time basis – – that is, working to see if deadlines can be met quickly, information uploaded to their sites immediately and if they can be the first publishers of the coveted information. Although blogging has the nature of being “quick”, “fast” and “right now”, corporate environments can use the benefits of slow blogging to deliver concepts and ideas to their investors and to their buying audiences. If there is a new product or service that is being developed, corporations can use the slow blogging concept to deliver non time-sensitive information on a more relaxed basis to their blogging audience. The information of course is not going to be front page news, but will be pertinent, thorough, succinct and able to capture and hold the reader’s attention.

What makes slow blogging so intriguing is not the speed at which the blogging is done, but more of how less it is done. In other words, the old adage that says, “good things are worth waiting for”, may in fact be a valuable lesson in this respect. Bloggers who take the time to grow and develop their stories in an interesting, informative fashion are more likely to be successful. Because we live in a news and information vacuum, society almost hurriedly dictates that we deliver information right away. A good idea? Not necessarily, but delivering the right information, at the right time, to the right audience is a good idea. One that perhaps the client would prefer over anything that is hurried along.