Search the FTSE 100 - if you can

Do you think that having a search facility on your site is a fairly standard best practice these days?

I do.

And yet 17% of the FTSE 100 do not have a search box (or link to a search page) on their home page. Why is this?
Read the rest of this article …

If you're new here, and have enjoyed what you've read, you may want to subscribe to my RSS feed. Thanks for visiting!

Posted on April 3, 2008 by Lucy and filed under All stakeholders, Basic materials, Best Practices, Consumer goods, Consumer services, Financials, Ideas and Trends, Technology | Leave a Comment

Site Review: ArcelorMittal’s TV channel

ArcelorMittal are doing a great job of communication over at Creating History.

ArcelorMittal TV - Creating HistoryThis site is dedicated to the merger of Arcelor and Mittal, and consists of:

Read the rest of this article …

Posted on November 21, 2007 by Lucy and filed under Basic materials, Best Practices, Employee, Ideas and Trends, Investor, Shareholders, Site Reviews | Leave a Comment

8 ways of charting your share price (or not)

Ever wondered what everyone else was using to chart their share price? Here are eight different ways of charting the share price.

ENI share price chartMany if not most FTSE 100 companies now provide interactive share charting facilities, so that visitors can see the trend over the last day, week, month … or whatever period interests them.

Some companies provide the option to compare the performance of their stock with indices and sector - perhaps the FTSE or equivalent, or a set of related companies.

A subset of these companies make it easy to compare their own performance with that of their direct competition. For example, Roche make it easy to see how they are doing compared to Bayer, or Pfizer, GSK or AstraZeneca (among several others).

A very few companies make it easy to compare their performance against apparently any listed company. Read the rest of this article …

Posted on November 5, 2007 by Lucy and filed under Basic materials, Best Practices, Consumer goods, Consumer services, Financials, Investor, Oil & gas, Shareholders, Utilities | Leave a Comment

How to show the relationship between stock price and events

Unless your company is very new indeed, there will be a history of rises and falls in the share price. Investors - both existing and potential - will want to understand this history.
Benetton stock chart
Some companies explain this by linking peaks and troughs on the share charts to press releases or RNS releases which cover the events related to the change.

Benetton is an example of this style of presentation; clicking on one of the markers on the line graph brings up a link to that release. Read the rest of this article …

Posted on October 20, 2007 by Lucy and filed under Basic materials, Best Practices, Consumer goods, Consumer services, Financials, Health care, Investor | 1 Comment

Techniques for enticing the green investor

How can you persuade the green investor to invest in your company, if your environmental credentials are looking rather weak?

Some industries, by their very nature, are going to do more harm to the environment than others. Companies working in consumer services rather than in basic materials are bound to find it easier to ‘go green’, and to target the green investor.
Bloggers Unite - Blog Action Day
But how picky should the green investor be?

Is it better for the green money to go to the company who is already performing well, and for whom the percentage improvement possible is relatively tiny, or to go to the company who has performed badly in the past, but who is making huge improvements?

Wouldn’t it better for us all, in the long run, to support those companies in the more harmful - but essential - sectors who are doing the most to improve?

Improving the performance of those companies who currently do the most damage to the environment, and rewarding those who manage to make the most improvement each year, will surely make a bigger difference, overall, than rewarding those whose industry has a relatively light footprint in the first place.

We need assessment techniques that show us not only how good/bad each company’s performance is on a number of different measures, but also how much that performance has changed over time. We need to see the trend for each company, and, ideally, to be able to compare this to the performance of other companies.

BP - environmental performanceSome companies make it easy to see how their performance in this area has changed over time, such as BP, who provide 5-year data for visitors to review. It would be great if we could see the same measures on other sites for comparison purposes.

How is CSR performance measured?

There are several major CSR indices, awards, and other methods of assessing a company’s CSR performance, including:

All these are wonderful tools and techniques for reporting and rewarding companies who work hard at CSR. Many companies are signed up to one or more, and some have won awards.

If your company hasn’t considered any of the above - why not think about it now? There are resources available to help on each of the sites above.

However, some companies are excluded by their very nature from some of the above. The FTSE4Good Index, for instance, excludes tobacco companies, weapons companies, and those working in the nuclear industry.

What can be done to support these companies in their efforts to improve?

What can be done to encourage those companies who have no interest in it to improve their performances in CSR?

What are the benefits in CSR - and in green investment?

There are definite benefits to engaging in CSR activities, and these have been outlined many times (see CSR Network for a summary of the argument for CSR), including:

These are the arguments that must be used to persuade companies that it is in their own interests to work on CSR.

Once that’s done, though, how can green-inclined investors be persuaded to invest in companies that are currently not-very-green?

I suggest that the answer is explaining:

  1. that engaging in CSR activity results in enhanced financial performance for the company
  2. that improvements in CSR in currently poorly performing companies (in CSR terms) could achieve big results environmentally
  3. that investing in a company with a long way to go in CSR terms but which wishes to improve will therefore achieve big results environmentally (thus benefiting the world) - and, probably, financially as well (thus benefiting the investor).

Crucially, of course, the company must be persuaded into a CSR programme before this will work - but once it has agreed, getting the green investors on board will surely add momentum.

This post is part of Blog Action Day, in which bloggers around the world are discussing environmental issues.

Posted on October 15, 2007 by Lucy and filed under Basic materials, Corporate social responsibility, Ideas and Trends, Industrials, Investor, Oil & gas, Utilities | 2 Comments

keep looking »