<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Jaguar Employees Vote for 4-Day Work Week Instead of Layoffs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2009/03/jaguar-employees-vote-for-4-day-work-week-instead-of-layoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2009/03/jaguar-employees-vote-for-4-day-work-week-instead-of-layoffs/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2009/03/jaguar-employees-vote-for-4-day-work-week-instead-of-layoffs/#comment-1951</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 12:53:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=4567#comment-1951</guid>
		<description>I wonder if the current state of the economy is the catalyst needed to really push telecommuting as a viable option for some of the more stodgy companies that insisted on having workers in the office and under thumb?

Also, rather than eliminating a full workday as they did here; a compressed 40-hour work week might be an option.  Run the shop 7:00-6:00 on Mon-Thu and shut everything down on Fridays.  That might be an easier pill to swallow than mandatory layoffs.  I know this won&#039;t work in many places, but the cost-savings in operating the office/facility alone might help prevent layoffs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if the current state of the economy is the catalyst needed to really push telecommuting as a viable option for some of the more stodgy companies that insisted on having workers in the office and under thumb?</p>
<p>Also, rather than eliminating a full workday as they did here; a compressed 40-hour work week might be an option.  Run the shop 7:00-6:00 on Mon-Thu and shut everything down on Fridays.  That might be an easier pill to swallow than mandatory layoffs.  I know this won&#8217;t work in many places, but the cost-savings in operating the office/facility alone might help prevent layoffs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

