<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Trust Me, I Know: The Marketing Power of Authoritative Content	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/trust-authoritative-content/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/trust-authoritative-content/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 02:03:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erica Harrison		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/trust-authoritative-content/#comment-13618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erica Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2012 02:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=41597#comment-13618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much for your comment. Yes, news from the experts does indeed indicate that Google will be promoting authorship, but not necessarily as the sole basis for ranking - it will be more of an additional component in their effort to clean up the content that is found on the Internet. Some argue that it is yet another way for Google to control the Internet, but I personally  am grateful for their attempts to acknowledge well-written, authoritative content. Some also claim that Google walks a fine line between quality-control and monopolization, however, which is an interesting thought as well. Regardless,  authorship ranking is in its infancy, and it will be very interesting to see which direction it takes.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much for your comment. Yes, news from the experts does indeed indicate that Google will be promoting authorship, but not necessarily as the sole basis for ranking &#8211; it will be more of an additional component in their effort to clean up the content that is found on the Internet. Some argue that it is yet another way for Google to control the Internet, but I personally  am grateful for their attempts to acknowledge well-written, authoritative content. Some also claim that Google walks a fine line between quality-control and monopolization, however, which is an interesting thought as well. Regardless,  authorship ranking is in its infancy, and it will be very interesting to see which direction it takes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: top brand consultants		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/trust-authoritative-content/#comment-13616</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[top brand consultants]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2012 06:31:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=41597#comment-13616</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m reading through your blog since it&#039;s so fascinating; the content is straight to the point and clear. Moving on to the article, isn&#039;t it that Google&#039;s also on the move to promote authorship as the basis for ranking?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m reading through your blog since it&#8217;s so fascinating; the content is straight to the point and clear. Moving on to the article, isn&#8217;t it that Google&#8217;s also on the move to promote authorship as the basis for ranking?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
