<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Look at Rolls-Royce&#8217;s Investor Site	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/rolls-royce-investor-site/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/rolls-royce-investor-site/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Clare Lynch		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/rolls-royce-investor-site/#comment-9370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clare Lynch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:44:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=29669#comment-9370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;Integrated&quot; has to be one of the most over-used corporate words after &quot;solutions&quot;. (Actually, more often than not, solutions are themselves described as integrated).

I have long hated the nasty word &quot;integrated&quot; - it&#039;s clunky, Latinate and meaningless to most ordinary people. Well done, you, for picking up on this particular use!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Integrated&#8221; has to be one of the most over-used corporate words after &#8220;solutions&#8221;. (Actually, more often than not, solutions are themselves described as integrated).</p>
<p>I have long hated the nasty word &#8220;integrated&#8221; &#8211; it&#8217;s clunky, Latinate and meaningless to most ordinary people. Well done, you, for picking up on this particular use!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
