<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Repackaging Campbell&#8217;s from the Top Down	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/repackaging-campbells-from-the-top-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/repackaging-campbells-from-the-top-down/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:19:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Carina C.		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/repackaging-campbells-from-the-top-down/#comment-10212</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carina C.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 17:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=32423#comment-10212</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Weird.  I thought they made this repackaging change ages ago, and I thought that many consumers (myself included) found the new packaging ridiculously difficult to locate flavours with. At least the old way, the font was big, bold, and clear.

But apparently I was just imagining things...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird.  I thought they made this repackaging change ages ago, and I thought that many consumers (myself included) found the new packaging ridiculously difficult to locate flavours with. At least the old way, the font was big, bold, and clear.</p>
<p>But apparently I was just imagining things&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
