<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: PC Manufacturers Finally Ditch the Gobbledygook	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/pc-manufacturers-finally-ditch-the-gobbledygook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/pc-manufacturers-finally-ditch-the-gobbledygook/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:35:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Karen Jones		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/pc-manufacturers-finally-ditch-the-gobbledygook/#comment-9467</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Karen Jones]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=29772#comment-9467</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Susan,
Great post.  I&#039;ve related it to the lifescience industry which is generally poorly lacking in this fundamental principal.  So many start-ups get a quick website up and running and write the copy themselves, copying and pasting from scientific journals.  The result is a boring, static description of technology and the applications are added at the end.  There seems to be little appreciation for good copywriting.
http://bioengagement.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/yes-but-how-will-it-help-me-ditch-the-features-and-give-me-the-benefits/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Susan,<br />
Great post.  I&#8217;ve related it to the lifescience industry which is generally poorly lacking in this fundamental principal.  So many start-ups get a quick website up and running and write the copy themselves, copying and pasting from scientific journals.  The result is a boring, static description of technology and the applications are added at the end.  There seems to be little appreciation for good copywriting.<br />
<a href="http://bioengagement.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/yes-but-how-will-it-help-me-ditch-the-features-and-give-me-the-benefits/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://bioengagement.wordpress.com/2009/10/11/yes-but-how-will-it-help-me-ditch-the-features-and-give-me-the-benefits/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
