<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Online Behavioral Ads Guidelines Released, Google Waits Days to Launch New Behavioral Ads Program	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/online-behavioral-ads-guidelines-released-google-waits-days-to-launch-new-behavioral-ads-program/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/online-behavioral-ads-guidelines-released-google-waits-days-to-launch-new-behavioral-ads-program/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rosa		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/online-behavioral-ads-guidelines-released-google-waits-days-to-launch-new-behavioral-ads-program/#comment-1977</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 17:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=4776#comment-1977</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In my opinion this is the same as what they do now, I don&#039;t see it as different from using my search question to pull up paid search ads. If anything this just means that I wont have to deal with irrelevant ads. The opt-out system is also more logical than an opt-in system, because only people concerned about privacy are willing to take the time to opt-out whereas people who are not concerned about privacy wouldn&#039;t take the time to opt-in because, well, people are lazy when they don&#039;t care about something. Overall, it is just a more efficient way to provide the same service.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my opinion this is the same as what they do now, I don&#8217;t see it as different from using my search question to pull up paid search ads. If anything this just means that I wont have to deal with irrelevant ads. The opt-out system is also more logical than an opt-in system, because only people concerned about privacy are willing to take the time to opt-out whereas people who are not concerned about privacy wouldn&#8217;t take the time to opt-in because, well, people are lazy when they don&#8217;t care about something. Overall, it is just a more efficient way to provide the same service.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
