<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: International Trademarking Problems for Apple&#8217;s iPhone	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/international-trademarking-problems-for-apples-iphone/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/international-trademarking-problems-for-apples-iphone/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:09:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/international-trademarking-problems-for-apples-iphone/#comment-6561</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:09:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=21581#comment-6561</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;d say to try option 4 considering Chinese companies are notorious for ignoring IP rights of foreign manufacturers, but that may not apply when it comes to infringing upon a Chinese company&#039;s trademark.  It appears that option 3 would be the wisest course, but then again I don&#039;t have a team of lawyers that could litigate Hanwang into submission.  It sounds like they could use a good legal thrashing anyways; &quot;i-phone&quot;, come on...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d say to try option 4 considering Chinese companies are notorious for ignoring IP rights of foreign manufacturers, but that may not apply when it comes to infringing upon a Chinese company&#8217;s trademark.  It appears that option 3 would be the wisest course, but then again I don&#8217;t have a team of lawyers that could litigate Hanwang into submission.  It sounds like they could use a good legal thrashing anyways; &#8220;i-phone&#8221;, come on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
