<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: History of the IBM Logo &#8211; Is It Time for a Logo Redesign?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/history-of-the-ibm-logo-is-it-time-for-a-logo-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/history-of-the-ibm-logo-is-it-time-for-a-logo-redesign/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2021 14:09:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: chris		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/history-of-the-ibm-logo-is-it-time-for-a-logo-redesign/#comment-13119</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 20:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=34414#comment-13119</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah I think some logos just can stay the way they are, even though tweaking the IBM logo a tad might not hurt. It just works so well as is, it would be really difficult to try to recreate or redesign something so perfect.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I think some logos just can stay the way they are, even though tweaking the IBM logo a tad might not hurt. It just works so well as is, it would be really difficult to try to recreate or redesign something so perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Sutton		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/history-of-the-ibm-logo-is-it-time-for-a-logo-redesign/#comment-11211</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Sutton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=34414#comment-11211</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If it ain&#039;t broke, don&#039;t fix it.

The current logo was designed by a master, Paul Rand (no, not Rand Paul).

The previous AT&#038;T logo was created by yet another master (and Rand confrere), Saul Bass -- and the recent redesign, IMHO, doesn&#039;t come up to his armpits.

Just because years pass doesn&#039;t mean the design isn&#039;t as strong as ever. Viz, Coca-Cola, GE, Ford...

IBM&#039;s logo is still great.  They should keep it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If it ain&#8217;t broke, don&#8217;t fix it.</p>
<p>The current logo was designed by a master, Paul Rand (no, not Rand Paul).</p>
<p>The previous AT&amp;T logo was created by yet another master (and Rand confrere), Saul Bass &#8212; and the recent redesign, IMHO, doesn&#8217;t come up to his armpits.</p>
<p>Just because years pass doesn&#8217;t mean the design isn&#8217;t as strong as ever. Viz, Coca-Cola, GE, Ford&#8230;</p>
<p>IBM&#8217;s logo is still great.  They should keep it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
