<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Google and Motorola &#8211; Perfect Match or Mistake?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/google-and-motorola-perfect-match-or-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/google-and-motorola-perfect-match-or-mistake/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Vasco		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/google-and-motorola-perfect-match-or-mistake/#comment-13319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vasco]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:29:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=38566#comment-13319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Even if one takes into account the thousands of added patents, I don&#039;t think Google have made the right decision to effectively aliente themselves from HTC, Sony and Samsung. In order to justify the aforementioned action, they would have to become substantially more competitive (perhaps even dominant) to Apple, which I feel is very unlikely.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if one takes into account the thousands of added patents, I don&#8217;t think Google have made the right decision to effectively aliente themselves from HTC, Sony and Samsung. In order to justify the aforementioned action, they would have to become substantially more competitive (perhaps even dominant) to Apple, which I feel is very unlikely.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
