<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Dell Named Leading Green IT Brand	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:55:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Scott		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/#comment-2048</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scott]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:55:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=4983#comment-2048</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m surprised at Dell taking the top spot.  Based on research I had done last year and data I pulled from HP&#039;s site, they seemed to be way ahead of their competitors when it came to reducing power consumption on their hardware (especially servers).

HP also appeared to be a leader in product reuse and/or recycling.  I know HP has frequently taken knocks over excessive product packaging, but I wonder if Dell won on performance or just perception.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised at Dell taking the top spot.  Based on research I had done last year and data I pulled from HP&#8217;s site, they seemed to be way ahead of their competitors when it came to reducing power consumption on their hardware (especially servers).</p>
<p>HP also appeared to be a leader in product reuse and/or recycling.  I know HP has frequently taken knocks over excessive product packaging, but I wonder if Dell won on performance or just perception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: EDunigan - TrackVia		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/#comment-2045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[EDunigan - TrackVia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=4983#comment-2045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It is good to see companies embracing green IT, however it is a little concerning that packaging that looks clean and green was a factor in the study.

I am all about design, but these companies should at least make sure the packaging is green (recycled, etc.) and not just made to look green.  I don&#039;t want to see IT companies going the way of CPG companies and putting unhealthy products in packaging that has the perception of being green.

See more at my post - Green IT - Is package design enough?:

http://www.corporate-eye.com/2009/03/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is good to see companies embracing green IT, however it is a little concerning that packaging that looks clean and green was a factor in the study.</p>
<p>I am all about design, but these companies should at least make sure the packaging is green (recycled, etc.) and not just made to look green.  I don&#8217;t want to see IT companies going the way of CPG companies and putting unhealthy products in packaging that has the perception of being green.</p>
<p>See more at my post &#8211; Green IT &#8211; Is package design enough?:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.corporate-eye.com/2009/03/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/" rel="ugc">http://www.corporate-eye.com/2009/03/dell-named-leading-green-it-brand/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
