<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Uncover The Clue to Hue &#8211; Color and Corporate Web Design	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:45:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Erica Harrison		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/#comment-13597</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Erica Harrison]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Sep 2012 18:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=41425#comment-13597</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/#comment-13596&quot;&gt;NeilJ&lt;/a&gt;.

Hi NeilJ

Thanks for taking the time to comment. You&#039;re quite right: these sources aren&#039;t recent, though I think the points they make are still useful. I try my best to acknowledge the original researchers who developed the ideas behind each topic that I write about, as I firmly believe in academic integrity. Many times this entails citing work written quite a ways back. I am sure there is much more recent work, and I’d be very interested to read it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/#comment-13596">NeilJ</a>.</p>
<p>Hi NeilJ</p>
<p>Thanks for taking the time to comment. You&#8217;re quite right: these sources aren&#8217;t recent, though I think the points they make are still useful. I try my best to acknowledge the original researchers who developed the ideas behind each topic that I write about, as I firmly believe in academic integrity. Many times this entails citing work written quite a ways back. I am sure there is much more recent work, and I’d be very interested to read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NeilJ		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/color-corporate-web-design/#comment-13596</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NeilJ]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Sep 2012 20:45:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=41425#comment-13596</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Your two sources are from the mid 1980&#039;s,  how can you attempt to make claims and generalize from wildly outdated research?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your two sources are from the mid 1980&#8217;s,  how can you attempt to make claims and generalize from wildly outdated research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
