<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Chevron: Corporate Communications in a Controversy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/chevron-corporate-communications-in-a-controversy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/chevron-corporate-communications-in-a-controversy/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 17:26:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bridget Wright		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/chevron-corporate-communications-in-a-controversy/#comment-3651</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bridget Wright]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 04:53:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=11971#comment-3651</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anna,  thank you so much for your honest comments and feedback. However, wouldn&#039;t you say that it&#039;s only fair if Chevron gets to tell their side of the story, and in the fashion they so choose?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anna,  thank you so much for your honest comments and feedback. However, wouldn&#8217;t you say that it&#8217;s only fair if Chevron gets to tell their side of the story, and in the fashion they so choose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anna		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/chevron-corporate-communications-in-a-controversy/#comment-3591</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 23:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/?p=11971#comment-3591</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[To me it looks like Chevron is just trying to downplay the whole thing, hide the truth and avoid responsibility. I watched 60 minutes piece about the contamination in Ecuador and Chevron’s spokesperson had a chance to tell their side of the story. She sounded unprepared and ridiculous. She compared oil in her makeup to oil in the oil pits that is killing those poor Ecuadorians!! If Chevron wasn’t hiding something, wouldn’t their side of the story be easier to be told and questions answered with no hesitation?
Also, here’s an interesting blog about the contamination: http://www.thechevronpit.blogspot.com]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To me it looks like Chevron is just trying to downplay the whole thing, hide the truth and avoid responsibility. I watched 60 minutes piece about the contamination in Ecuador and Chevron’s spokesperson had a chance to tell their side of the story. She sounded unprepared and ridiculous. She compared oil in her makeup to oil in the oil pits that is killing those poor Ecuadorians!! If Chevron wasn’t hiding something, wouldn’t their side of the story be easier to be told and questions answered with no hesitation?<br />
Also, here’s an interesting blog about the contamination: <a href="http://www.thechevronpit.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.thechevronpit.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
