<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Funny Business	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:47:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Cynthia		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1768</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 02:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=3579#comment-1768</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1766&quot;&gt;Aaron&lt;/a&gt;.

Thanks so much for your comment, Aaron.  That was one of my first thoughts too about Jack in the Box--but I was surprised when I explored the site.  It&#039;s used for all types of positions, including professional.  Home, Why Jack (the funniest part), and Benefits would be the same for all visitors, then on the Roles at Jack page, they can choose from Restaurant (job descriptions for team members, managers, etc.), Corporate (a long list that includes IT, HR, R&#038;D, accounting, etc.), and Distribution.  So I think the JITB messaging may be driven more by brand fidelity than by demographics.  But I definitely agree with you that humor has to fit the audience!  

Actually, the key thing about the Jack site may not be so much that it&#039;s funny, but that it&#039;s interesting.  Although the Geico site isn&#039;t funny, having the Gecko there adds interest--and differentiates from the competition--so it works well in its own way, without losing the professional tone.  

Most of the sites I looked at for this post were both not funny &lt;em&gt;and&lt;/em&gt; not interesting, but I&#039;ll keep looking and if I find any that break out of the box, will do a follow-up.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1766">Aaron</a>.</p>
<p>Thanks so much for your comment, Aaron.  That was one of my first thoughts too about Jack in the Box&#8211;but I was surprised when I explored the site.  It&#8217;s used for all types of positions, including professional.  Home, Why Jack (the funniest part), and Benefits would be the same for all visitors, then on the Roles at Jack page, they can choose from Restaurant (job descriptions for team members, managers, etc.), Corporate (a long list that includes IT, HR, R&amp;D, accounting, etc.), and Distribution.  So I think the JITB messaging may be driven more by brand fidelity than by demographics.  But I definitely agree with you that humor has to fit the audience!  </p>
<p>Actually, the key thing about the Jack site may not be so much that it&#8217;s funny, but that it&#8217;s interesting.  Although the Geico site isn&#8217;t funny, having the Gecko there adds interest&#8211;and differentiates from the competition&#8211;so it works well in its own way, without losing the professional tone.  </p>
<p>Most of the sites I looked at for this post were both not funny <em>and</em> not interesting, but I&#8217;ll keep looking and if I find any that break out of the box, will do a follow-up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Cynthia		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1767</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Cynthia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:58:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=3579#comment-1767</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1761&quot;&gt;Click and Inc&lt;/a&gt;.

Glad you enjoyed the post, Click and Inc!  I suspect that many companies will want to appear extra-serious in these times of economic challenge.  But as you point out, a touch of humor creates an optimistic impression--and that could actually have a lot of value right now.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1761">Click and Inc</a>.</p>
<p>Glad you enjoyed the post, Click and Inc!  I suspect that many companies will want to appear extra-serious in these times of economic challenge.  But as you point out, a touch of humor creates an optimistic impression&#8211;and that could actually have a lot of value right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Aaron		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1766</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Aaron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:39:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=3579#comment-1766</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I think there is an aspect of this that deals with the type of candidates the companies need to attract.  Jack in the Box has a significant number of lower paid, hourly type workers that tend to be younger.  Their website has struck a tone that seems to focus on that demographic from a marketing perspective, whereas Geico is focusing on a more professional image (and probably candidate).  

I&#039;d be curious to find a company website that is targeting mostly professional-level talent, but doing so with humor and levity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there is an aspect of this that deals with the type of candidates the companies need to attract.  Jack in the Box has a significant number of lower paid, hourly type workers that tend to be younger.  Their website has struck a tone that seems to focus on that demographic from a marketing perspective, whereas Geico is focusing on a more professional image (and probably candidate).  </p>
<p>I&#8217;d be curious to find a company website that is targeting mostly professional-level talent, but doing so with humor and levity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Click and Inc		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/brand-compliance-funny-brand-serious-subject/#comment-1761</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Click and Inc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=3579#comment-1761</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[this is a great post and brings up a good point about humor in the workplace. Every job has some sort of humor somewhere. If not it would be just miserable go to work everyday. I think humor on the website actually shows the applicant that it would be an enjoyable experience to work there.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is a great post and brings up a good point about humor in the workplace. Every job has some sort of humor somewhere. If not it would be just miserable go to work everyday. I think humor on the website actually shows the applicant that it would be an enjoyable experience to work there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
