<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: A Brace of Indices	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/a-brace-of-indices/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/a-brace-of-indices/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:28:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Tuley		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/a-brace-of-indices/#comment-114</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Tuley]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 23:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=422#comment-114</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;...no doubt for a fee!&quot; Ha! No doubt.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;&#8230;no doubt for a fee!&#8221; Ha! No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Milton		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/a-brace-of-indices/#comment-113</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Milton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 May 2008 08:57:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=422#comment-113</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hi Matt,

Essentially it&#039;s a score, so 10% is 10% of the maximum score one could get for product piracy.  

The interest is twofold: that Pearson got such a low score in their sector and that the sector itself is comparatively low scoring.

I agree with your point though: essentially that while percentages are great for comparisons like this, they don&#039;t really tell you much of the underlying figures.

Hence &quot;tales yet to be told&quot;, no doubt for a fee!

Best Wishes

Chris.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Matt,</p>
<p>Essentially it&#8217;s a score, so 10% is 10% of the maximum score one could get for product piracy.  </p>
<p>The interest is twofold: that Pearson got such a low score in their sector and that the sector itself is comparatively low scoring.</p>
<p>I agree with your point though: essentially that while percentages are great for comparisons like this, they don&#8217;t really tell you much of the underlying figures.</p>
<p>Hence &#8220;tales yet to be told&#8221;, no doubt for a fee!</p>
<p>Best Wishes</p>
<p>Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt Tuley, Laptop for Hire		</title>
		<link>https://www.corporate-eye.com/main/a-brace-of-indices/#comment-111</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt Tuley, Laptop for Hire]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 May 2008 15:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=422#comment-111</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&quot;These can show tales yet to be told: for instance the overall leader in the media section, Pearson, only scores 10% for product piracy while the highest score for this indicator in this sector is 50%.&quot;

I was looking at this graphic, trying to make sense of it. Pearson scores a 10%. 10% of what?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;These can show tales yet to be told: for instance the overall leader in the media section, Pearson, only scores 10% for product piracy while the highest score for this indicator in this sector is 50%.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was looking at this graphic, trying to make sense of it. Pearson scores a 10%. 10% of what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
