Apple is facing a problem that is certainly not new to the world of branding and international trademarking. There are over one billion people in China, and many of them desperately want an iPhone (rumor has it that over 1 million Chinese consumers already own one having gotten them through unofficial channels – via ComputerWorld).
Apple’s problem isn’t a lack of demand for the iPhone around the world, it’s trademarking roadblocks. First up — China and a little company named Hanwang who owns the trademark for i-phone in that country.
Back in 2002, Apple registered the iPhone trademark in China, but according to a ComputerWorld article, the registration only covered computer hardware and software, not phones or mobile phones. Seems like a big oversight. In 2004, a company named Hanwang registered i-phone in the phone equipment and mobile phone categories. So now Apple has a big problem.
What should Apple do? Let’s look at the choices:
- Apple can try to purchase the trademark rights from Hanwang (who did sell a handset called i-phone at one point). Rumor has it Apple has not approached Hanwang to begin negotiations.
- Apple can apply to the trademark office asking to have Hanwang’s trademark revoked. Rumor has it this process takes several years and usually doesn’t work. To date, Hanwang claims to have not been contacted by the trademark office about any such filing.
- Apple can rebrand the iPhone for the China market. This is not uncommon for brands that don’t translate well into foreign languages.
- Apple can ignore everyone and release the iPhone as the iPhone in China and let the chips fall where they may. Typically, this is not a good strategy to follow for so many reasons.
What do you think? What should Apple do? It seems as though they should try to negotiate a reasonable deal to obtain the iPhone trademark in China, but if Hanwang isn’t amenable to a deal, then is it really that big of a deal if the iPhone needs to go by a different name in China? Which is more important, the name or the product? While there is value to the iPhone brand name, the Apple name certainly can carry its own weight. I don’t think a different product name would be a sales killer in this case. Would you still want or buy an Apple iPhone if it’s name were changed to Apple aPhone? What if it were changed to Microsoft iPhone? Would your answer change? Again, I think the Apple brand name is more important in this case. I don’t think I’d sweat it too much if I were in Apple’s shoes. The potential 1 billion audience far outweighs the initial investment in rebranding the product.
Latest posts by Susan Gunelius (see all)
- Coca-Cola Contour Bottle Turns 100 This Year - March 3, 2015
- World’s 50 Most Popular Brands - February 25, 2015
- Brands with the Most Loyal Customers in 2015 - February 18, 2015
- The World’s 50 Most Innovative Companies in 2015 - February 14, 2015
- UK Consumers Will Share Private Data with Brands Under Certain Conditions - February 4, 2015