I recall a 1967 GM product, a Pontiac Tempest. What a piece of junk. The transmission leaked and despite some heated calls between GM customer service and the auto dealer, the problem continued. Finally, in disgust I went to a transmission shop and got it fixed.
Years later, when I was cleaning out the trunk, I found a cigar butt that was sprayed with the paint used to paint the trunk. Apparently, an assembly line worker tossed it there.
One car but it was indicative of quality problems that would dog the company right up to its recent bankruptcy.
Then there was a course I attended that was given by noted guru Peter Drucker. He lectured about GM and how Alfred Sloane in the 1920′s changed the company into the icon it was until June 1, 2009. Then I came upon this in the Financial Times –
GM, Drucker and the role of the guru
June 1, 2009 4:16pm by Stefan Stern
Can’t let today go by without making a short comment about the decline of General Motors. This was one of the organisations that Peter Drucker knew best. He based his 1946 book Concept of the Corporation on what he had learned there.
While the book is often seen as an extended hymn of praise to GM, it did not go down well internally. As Rick Wartzman pointed out here last year, GM managers did not like the critical bits – especially when Drucker had the nerve to suggest that things might have to change if the company wanted to survive.
In the 1990s Drucker himself said, immodestly but not inaccurately, that GM’s potential problems had been foreseen by him 50 years earlier.
Gurus are always right in the end. You just have to be patient.
Then there is this from Gary Hamel’s recent blog (a must read)–
Ever since I can remember, GM’s defenders have been arguing that the company was making progress; and they were right. GM has been getting better for a very long time-but it’s been 40 years since it was the best. The Chevrolet Malibu and Corvette ZR1, the Buick Enclave and Cadillac CTS-V: these are exceptional cars by anyone’s standards. Problem is, they are even more exceptional when judged against the persistent ordinariness of GM’s other products. For years, excellence at GM has been an occasional aberration, rather than an all-consuming passion.
GM has a daunting list of issues to deal with–
- The US government, GM’s largest stockowner may find it difficult to avoid meddling in business decisions
- Talent Management, will the company find it difficult to attract top management?
- How will it deal with what may be the largest organizational change in corporate history?
- How will it rebuild its tarnished reputation?
These may be just the tip of the iceberg. Many stakeholders have “skin in this game”, we will see.
Image Source: www.clevelandleader.com/taxonomy/term/81
Latest posts by Ed Konczal (see all)
- Innovation Governance Requires Technology Smarts - September 6, 2013
- Tone At The Top Drives Innovation Governance - April 26, 2013
- What is Innovation Governance? - April 4, 2013
- Governance Lags Innovation - March 8, 2013
- Innovation and Corporate Governance: Risks and Opportunities - January 16, 2013