Corporate Eye

Continental and United Airlines Merger Brings New Brand and Logo – Sort Of

May 7, 2010
by

This week, Continental Airlines and United Airlines announced a planned merger creating the largest airline.  While the two airlines claim their routes barely overlap and the merger should be completed by the end of 2010, the Chairman of the U.S. House Transportation Committee, Congressman Jim Oberstar has asked the U.S. Justice Department to block the merger.  While we wait for the merger to be approved by antitrust regulators and shareholders (and let’s face it — it’s unlikely the merger won’t happen), consumers can already see some of the effects of the merger with a new brand identity and logo — sort of.

First, a snippet about the new brand from the merger press release:

The holding company for the new entity will be named United Continental Holdings, Inc. and the name of the airline will be United Airlines. The marketing brand will be a combination of the brands of both companies. Aircraft will have the Continental livery, logo and colors with the United name, and the announcement campaign slogan will be “Let’s Fly Together.”

Next, a peak at the new logo, which combines the United name with the old Continental icon:

united_continental_logo

Finally, a look at the new airplanes that look very similar to the old Continental planes with the United name replacing the Continental name.

united_continental_airplane_585px

What do you think of the interim branding solution?  Love it or hate it? Would a complete rebrand with a new name and logo unrelated to either of the previous brands have been a better choice?

Of course, it’s still quite possible that a complete rebranding will happen in the year or so following the merger completion, so the question is whether the Continental and United brands have enough value to warrant keeping either.  Would consumers lament the loss of either brand?  It’s doubtful.

Truth be told, both brands carry a lot of negative baggage (no pun intended), and a complete rebranding could be just the ticket this company needs (again, no pun intended … well, maybe a little).

What do you think?  Leave a comment and share your thoughts.

Images: UnitedContinentalMerger.com

The following two tabs change content below.
My Twitter profileMy Facebook profileMy Google+ profileMy LinkedIn profile

Susan Gunelius

President & CEO at KeySplash Creative, Inc.
Susan Gunelius is the author of 10 marketing, social media, branding, copywriting, and technology books, and she is President & CEO of KeySplash Creative, Inc., a marketing communications company. She also owns Women on Business, an award-wining blog for business women. She is a featured columnist for Entrepreneur.com and Forbes.com, and her marketing-related articles have appeared on websites such as MSNBC.com, BusinessWeek.com, TodayShow.com, and more. She has over 20 years of experience in the marketing field having spent the first decade of her career directing marketing programs for some of the largest companies in the world, including divisions of AT&T and HSBC. Today, her clients include large and small companies around the world and household brands like Citigroup, Cox Communications, Intuit, and more. Susan is frequently interviewed about marketing and branding by television, radio, print, and online media organizations, and she speaks about these topics at events around the world. You can connect with her on Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, or Google+.

Related posts:

No related posts.

 
Comments
jeffrey porter
May 8, 2010 at 12:21 am

According to this quote, this travesty of a logo is here to stay:

Quote from Wall Street Journal:
One thing that has been set is the branding and logo of the combined airline, whose new slogan is “Let’s Fly Together.”

And according to this quote, the CEO’s came up with it all by themselves.

Quote from Wall Street Journal:
The planned marketing brand, the United name and the Continental livery, logo and colors “was agreed between the two of us,” Mr. Tilton said, instead of going through committee.

Here’s other links that offer more insight into this debacle:
http://subjectiveobject.com/2010/05/04/it%E2%80%99s-merged-but-is-it-united/comment-page-1/#comment-152

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/abraham/detail?entry_id=62775

http://www.fastcompany.com/1638794/the-new-united-contintental-logo-flying-a-little-too-close-together

http://www.flyertalk.com/forum/united-mileage-plus/1080900-united-adopt-co-globe-logo-livery-lets-fly-together.html

http://www.underconsideration.com/brandnew/archives/the_united_and_continental_airline_mashup.php

http://www.usatoday.com/travel/flights/item.aspx?type=blog&ak=90652.blog#uslPageReturn

Mark
August 8, 2010 at 4:27 am

My gosh, I seriously dislike the Continental logo and colors…always have. It is like comparing Microsoft and Apple when it comes to brand identity. When you park that new color and logo at Heathrow, Hong Kong, Shanghai, etc…it will look sooo boring compared to the hip foreign competitors.

Mark
August 15, 2010 at 12:33 pm

I think the colors look great! It actually shows a true merger using the UA name and the CO logo. One thing I thought they should have added would be to replace the gray below the gold line with navy blue. But all in all the new brand looks great.

Glenn Cash
March 19, 2011 at 2:06 am

As to the new United/Continental logo – YAWN! Not very exciting, especially when considering the formation of the worlds largest airline. It looks like it was decided by the airline executives themselves in a compromise, which is actually what happened. They merely lopped off part of each and stuck them together. They should have turned it over to someone (people) who create logos for a living. A logo should create positive instant recognition for the new company rather than a memory of things and times past. If one is drawn to the memory of United or Continental, there is a good chance that some bad memories may come up also. If the old logos must be retained for customer continuity, then combine them in a way that is new, creative, forward looking and exciting. Being a United Frequent Flyer, it is more important to me to get where I want to go, when I need to leave and arrive and when promised that I will get there, with a pleasant and comfortable experience. That means good service with no unpleasant surprises or hidden fees.

Justin Kroop
May 26, 2011 at 3:18 am

Now that the new airline has begun “Customer Day One”, they have unveiled a new logo, taking the United name and Continental icon, with a new shade of blue. Begs the question, why not go with something new altogether? Further thoughts found here: http://www.theinstargroup.com/blog/2011/05/18/united-and-continental-airlines-merged-logos/

Trackbacks for this post

Comments are closed.

Search
From the archives
All Corporate Eye posts
Read more in our archives, or by stakeholder area:
Leading Digital Agency
"Without doubt, the Corporate Eye reports are the best in the market"
FTSE 100 Client
Having worked with a number of agencies that offer corporate website benchmarking and strategic advice, I have to say that the combination of Paul Nixon's strategic knowledge and real life experience combined with the power of Corporate Eye's tools puts him into a completely different league to other consultants
FTSE 100 Energy Client
The most useful part is being able to talk to someone about the strategy for digital communications and how best to translate these ideas into working practice – it’s what sets Corporate Eye apart from the others.
FTSE 250 Client
The Content strategy presentation was invaluable – it really helped us to piece together where we could do better and gave us some really good examples which we can adapt to our company and its audiences
FTSE 100 Telecommunications Client
Fantastic at brainstorming with and discussing upcoming trends etc. I find their input in the meetings a real help in strategising the next steps of the corporate site.