<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When Brands Attack &#8211; The Rise of Comparative Advertising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/10/when-brands-attack-the-rise-of-comparative-advertising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/10/when-brands-attack-the-rise-of-comparative-advertising/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 11:23:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adobe and Apple Battle over Flash in Ad Format &#124; Corporate Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/10/when-brands-attack-the-rise-of-comparative-advertising/#comment-10449</link>
		<dc:creator>Adobe and Apple Battle over Flash in Ad Format &#124; Corporate Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=2364#comment-10449</guid>
		<description>[...] advertising has been making a comeback in recent years with the Progresso vs. Campbell&#8217;s soup comparative ad campaign bringing back memories of the Coke vs. Pepsi challenge from decades earlier.  This week, Adobe and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] advertising has been making a comeback in recent years with the Progresso vs. Campbell&#8217;s soup comparative ad campaign bringing back memories of the Coke vs. Pepsi challenge from decades earlier.  This week, Adobe and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Branding Restraining Order for a Comparative Advertising No-No &#124; Corporate Eye</title>
		<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/10/when-brands-attack-the-rise-of-comparative-advertising/#comment-10006</link>
		<dc:creator>A Branding Restraining Order for a Comparative Advertising No-No &#124; Corporate Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 03:36:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=2364#comment-10006</guid>
		<description>[...] There is no doubt that comparative advertising can work.  It&#8217;s been around for a long time.  In fact, today&#8217;s comparative advertising is tame in comparison to claims from half a century ago (or more).  Of course, not all comparative advertising is equal.  In fact, some of it is quite extreme (&#8217;attack advertising&#8217;).  You can read more about my views on comparative advertising in this post on Corporate Eye. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] There is no doubt that comparative advertising can work.  It&#8217;s been around for a long time.  In fact, today&#8217;s comparative advertising is tame in comparison to claims from half a century ago (or more).  Of course, not all comparative advertising is equal.  In fact, some of it is quite extreme (&#8217;attack advertising&#8217;).  You can read more about my views on comparative advertising in this post on Corporate Eye. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

