<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disney Co. Chooses ESPN Brand Over Disney Brand</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/05/disney-co-chooses-espn-brand-over-disney-brand/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/05/disney-co-chooses-espn-brand-over-disney-brand/</link>
	<description>...compare, compete, excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 03:55:53 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Susan Gunelius</title>
		<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/05/disney-co-chooses-espn-brand-over-disney-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan Gunelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=349#comment-89</guid>
		<description>I agree, Matt.  From a marketing perspective and appealing to existing sports fans, I think rebranding with the ESPN name makes sense, but I&#039;m still surprised by this move which seems to run counter to Disney&#039;s existing branding strategy of extension and exploitation.  It&#039;s actually good to see Disney making a move in a different strategic direction.  As much as I&#039;m a Disney fan, there is value to not putting all your eggs in one basket.  Perhaps Disney is catching on to that old phrase.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, Matt.  From a marketing perspective and appealing to existing sports fans, I think rebranding with the ESPN name makes sense, but I&#8217;m still surprised by this move which seems to run counter to Disney&#8217;s existing branding strategy of extension and exploitation.  It&#8217;s actually good to see Disney making a move in a different strategic direction.  As much as I&#8217;m a Disney fan, there is value to not putting all your eggs in one basket.  Perhaps Disney is catching on to that old phrase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Tuley</title>
		<link>http://www.corporate-eye.com/blog/2008/05/disney-co-chooses-espn-brand-over-disney-brand/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Tuley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.corporate-eye.com/?p=349#comment-88</guid>
		<description>This makes complete sense to me. When I think &quot;Disney&quot; I don&#039;t think &quot;sports.&quot; I think they can only gain here. There&#039;s nothing about the ESPN brand that is any less family-friendly than the Disney brand, but I can think of a lot of folks in the sports-loving demographic that wouldn&#039;t want to go to a Disney facility because they think it would be too childish or not serious enough. It&#039;s a good move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This makes complete sense to me. When I think &#8220;Disney&#8221; I don&#8217;t think &#8220;sports.&#8221; I think they can only gain here. There&#8217;s nothing about the ESPN brand that is any less family-friendly than the Disney brand, but I can think of a lot of folks in the sports-loving demographic that wouldn&#8217;t want to go to a Disney facility because they think it would be too childish or not serious enough. It&#8217;s a good move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
